The extent and consequences of downward nominal wage rigidity
Files in This Item:
|Currently seeking full text.pdf||4.2 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|devereuxp_bookchap_post_012.pdf||315.61 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||The extent and consequences of downward nominal wage rigidity||Authors:||Devereux, Paul J.
Altonji, Joseph G.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/311||Date:||2000||Abstract:||Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we find that true wage changes have many fewer nominal cuts and more nominal freezes than reported nominal wage changes. The data overwhelmingly rejects a model of flexible wage changes and provides some evidence against a model of perfect downward rigidity in favor of a more general model. The more general model incorporates downward rigidity but specifies that nominal wage cuts may occur when large cuts would occur in the absence of wage rigidity. However, the results of the general model imply that nominal wage cuts are rare. We also analyze the personnel files of a large corporation and find cuts in base pay are rare and almost always associated with changes in full time status or a switch between compensation schemes involving incentives. Our evidence on the consequences of nominal wage rigidity is mixed. We find modest support for the hypothesis that workers who are overpaid because of nominal wage rigidity are less likely to quit.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Emerald Insight||Copyright (published version):||Elsevier 2000||Subject LCSH:||Wages
|DOI:||10.1016/S0147-9121(00)19015-6||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Geary Institute Research Collection|
Economics Research Collection
Show full item record
Page view(s) 10185
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.