Fenton and Fenton-like AOPs for alum sludge conditioning : effectiveness comparison with different Fe2+ and Fe3+ salts
|Title:||Fenton and Fenton-like AOPs for alum sludge conditioning : effectiveness comparison with different Fe2+ and Fe3+ salts||Authors:||Tony, Maha A.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/3119||Date:||Nov-2010||Online since:||2011-08-29T09:20:36Z||Abstract:||Currently, organic polymers are adopted in alum sludge (aluminium-coagulated drinking water treatment sludge) conditioning. However, there are important concerns regarding the use of these polymers because of the unknown and long-term effects of the potential release of excess polymer to the surrounding environment when the sludge is landfilled. Therefore, as an initiative action, this study aimed at investigating alternative chemical conditioning methods and focused mainly on exploiting Fenton (Fe2+/H2O2) and Fenton-like (Fe3+/H2O2) reagents as the conditioner. Experiments have been conducted to test the effectiveness of Fenton’s reagent (containing the ferrous salts of chloride, sulphate or oxalate), Fenton-like reagent (containing ferric salts of chloride and sulphate) and the coagulation method using FeCl3 for an alum sludge conditioning at a constant hydrogen peroxide and iron salt concentrations of 125 and 20 mg/g DS (dry solids), respectively. The effectiveness on dewaterability of the alum sludge demonstrated that the maximum reduction (%) of SRF (specific resistance to filtration) and CST (capillary suction time) of 74 % and 47 %, respectively, can be obtained when Fenton’s reagent was adopted for sludge conditioning. Such reduction of 64% for SRF and 38% for CST can be achieved when Fenton-like reagents were applied.||Funding Details:||Not applicable||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Taylor & Francis||Journal:||Chemical Engineering Communications||Volume:||198||Issue:||3||Start page:||442||End page:||452||Copyright (published version):||Taylor & Francis Group, LLC||Keywords:||Alum sludge; Conditioning; Fenton’s reagent; Fenton-like process; Capillary suction time (CST); Specific resistance to filtration (SRF)||Subject LCSH:||Water treatment plant residuals
Filters and filtration--Testing
|DOI:||10.1080/00986445.2010.520235||Other versions:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2010.520235||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Urban Institute Ireland Research Collection|
Critical Infrastructure Group Research Collection
Civil Engineering Research Collection
Show full item record
Page view(s) 20132
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.