Leachability and leaching patterns from aluminium-based water treatment residual used as media in laboratory-scale engineered wetlands

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
20-Leaching paper- For-ESPR.pdf298.69 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Leachability and leaching patterns from aluminium-based water treatment residual used as media in laboratory-scale engineered wetlands
Authors: Babatunde, A.O.
Zhao, Y.Q.
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/3127
Date: Aug-2010
Abstract: Concept and purpose Virtually all water treatment facilities worldwide generate an enormous amount of water treatment residual (WTR) solids for which environmentally-friendly end-use options are continually being sought as opposed to their landfilling. Aluminium-based WTR (Al-WTR) can offer huge benefits particularly for phosphorus (P) removal and biofilm attachment when used as media in engineered wetlands. However, potential environmental risks that may arise from the leaching out of its constituents must be properly evaluated before such reuse can be assured. This paper presents results of an assessment carried out to monitor and examine the leachability and leaching patterns of the constituents of an Al-WTR used as media in laboratory scale engineered wetland systems. Main features, materials and methods Al-WTR was used as media in four different configurations of laboratory scale engineered wetland systems treating agricultural wastewater. Selected metal levels were determined in the Al-WTR prior to being used while levels of total and dissolved concentration for the metals were monitored in the influent and effluent samples. The increase or decrease of these metals in the used Al-WTR and their potential for leaching were determined. Leached metal levels in the effluents were compared with relevant environmental quality standards to ascertain if they pose considerable risks. Results Aluminium, arsenic, iron, lead, and manganese were leached into the treated effluent, but aluminium exhibited the least leaching potential relative to the initial content in the fresh Al-WTR. Levels of P increased from 0.13 mg-P/g (fresh Al-WTR) to 33.9 mg-P/g – 40.6 mg-P/g (used Al-WTR). Dissolved levels of lead and arsenic (except on one instance) were below the prescribed limits for discharge. However, total and dissolved levels of aluminium were in most cases above the prescribed limits for discharge, especially at the beginning of the experiments. Conclusions, recommendations and perspectives Overall, the study indicate that when Al-WTR is beneficially reused for enhanced P removal in engineered wetlands as opposed to landfilling it, the leaching out of aluminium into the treated effluent beyond the prescribed limits of 0.2mg/l may be a potential problem. However, since the results obtained indicate that most of the aluminium leached out are associated with solids, a post-treatment unit which can further reduce the level of aluminium in the treated effluent by filtering out the solids could serve to mitigate this. Notwithstanding, the use of Al-WTR as a media in engineered wetlands can serve to greatly enhance the removal of P from wastewaters and also serve as support material for biofilm attachment.
Funding Details: Other funder
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Springer
Journal: Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Volume: 17
Issue: 7
Start page: 1314
End page: 1322
Copyright (published version): Springer-Verlag 2010
Keywords: Engineered wetlandsLeachingPhosphorusReuseWater treatment residualMetals
Subject LCSH: Constructed wetlands
Water treatment plant residuals
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-010-0311-5
Other versions: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-010-0311-5
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Centre for Water Resources Research Collection
Urban Institute Ireland Research Collection
Critical Infrastructure Group Research Collection
Civil Engineering Research Collection

Show full item record

Citations 20

Last Week
Last month
checked on Oct 19, 2018

Page view(s) 20

checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 10

checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM



This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.