Co-conditioning of the anaerobic digested sludge of a municipal wastewater treatment plant with alum sludge : benefit of phosphorus reduction in reject water

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Y.Q.-
dc.contributor.authorBabatunde, A.O.-
dc.contributor.authorKearney, P.-
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-28T13:32:51Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-28T13:32:51Z-
dc.date.copyright2007, Water Environment Federationen
dc.date.issued2007-12-
dc.identifier.citationWater Environment Researchen
dc.identifier.issn1061-4303-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/3275-
dc.description.abstractIn this study, alum sludge was introduced into co-conditioning and dewatering with an anaerobic digested activated sludge to examine the role of the alum sludge in improving the dewaterbility of the mixed sludge and also in immobilizing phosphorus in the reject water. Experiments have demonstrated that the optimal mix ratio for the two sludges is 2:1 (anaerobic digested sludge: alum sludge; volume basis), and this can bring about 99% phosphorus reduction in the reject water through the adsorption of phosphorus by Al in the sludge. The phosphorus loading in wastewater treatment plants is itself derived from the recycling of reject water during the wastewater treatment process. Consequently, this co-conditioning and dewatering strategy can achieve a significant reduction in phosphorus loading in wastewater treatment plants. In addition, the use of the alum sludge can beneficially enhance the dewaterbility of the resultant mixed sludge by decreasing both the SRF and the CST, due to the alum sludge acting as a skeleton builder. Experiments have also demonstrated that the optimal polymer (Superfloc C2260) dose for the anaerobic digested sludge was 120 mg/l while the optimal dose for the mixed sludge (mix ratio 2:1) was 15 mg/l, highlighting a huge saving in polymer addition. Therefore, from the technical perspective, the co-conditioning and dewatering strategy can be viewed as a “win-win” situation. However, for its full-scale application, integrated cost-effective analysis of process capabilities, sludge transport, increased cake disposal, additional administration, polymer saving etc. should be factored in.en
dc.description.sponsorshipOther funderen
dc.format.extent367301 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWater Environment Federationen
dc.relation.requiresCritical Infrastructure Group Research Collectionen
dc.relation.requiresUrban Institute Ireland Research Collectionen
dc.rightsThis paper may be downloaded for personal uses only. Any other use requires prior permission of the Water Environment Federation.en
dc.subjectAdsorptionen
dc.subjectAlum sludgeen
dc.subjectBiological phosphorus removalen
dc.subjectConditioningen
dc.subjectAnaerobic digested excess sludgeen
dc.subjectPhosphorus removalen
dc.subjectReject wateren
dc.subjectNutrient controlen
dc.subject.lcshPhosphates--Absorption and adsorptionen
dc.subject.lcshWater treatment plant residualsen
dc.subject.lcshSewage sludge--Conditioningen
dc.subject.lcshSewage--Purification--Anaerobic treatmenten
dc.titleCo-conditioning of the anaerobic digested sludge of a municipal wastewater treatment plant with alum sludge : benefit of phosphorus reduction in reject wateren
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.internal.availabilityFull text availableen
dc.internal.webversionshttp://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143007X184753-
dc.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.volume79en
dc.identifier.issue13en
dc.identifier.startpage2468en
dc.identifier.endpage2476en
dc.identifier.doi10.2175/106143007X184753-
dc.neeo.contributorYang|Y.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorZhao|Y.Q.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorBabatunde|A.O.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorKearney|P.|aut|-
dc.description.othersponsorshipEnvironmental Protection Agencyen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Centre for Water Resources Research Collection
Urban Institute Ireland Research Collection
Critical Infrastructure Group Research Collection
Civil Engineering Research Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
43-2121_0_art_0_jcnfki-sources.pdf358.69 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

17
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Mar 20, 2019

Page view(s) 5

280
checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 5

1,647
checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.