Upstand Finite Element Analysis of Slab Bridges
|Title:||Upstand Finite Element Analysis of Slab Bridges||Authors:||O'Brien, Eugene J.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4054||Date:||Dec-1998||Online since:||2013-01-16T17:35:22Z||Abstract:||For slab bridge decks with wide transverse edge cantilevers, the plane grillage analogy is shown to be an inaccurate method of linear elastic analysis due to variations in the vertical position of the neutral axis. The upstand grillage analogy is also shown to give inaccurate results, this time due to inappropriate modelling of in-plane distortions. An alternative method, known as upstand finite element analysis, is proposed which is sufficiently simple to be used on an everyday basis in the design office. The method is shown to give much better agreement than the others when compared with an elaborate three-dimensional solid finite element model. Single- and two-span bridge decks with solid and voided sections are considered for both longitudinal and transverse bending stresses.||Funding Details:||Not applicable||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Elsevier||Journal:||Computers and Structures||Volume:||69||Issue:||6||Start page:||671||End page:||683||Copyright (published version):||1998, Elsevier Science Ltd||Keywords:||Bridge; Bridge deck; Grillage; Finite element analysis; Voided slab||DOI:||10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00148-5||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Civil Engineering Research Collection|
Show full item record
Page view(s) 50114
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.