Goidelic inherent plurals and the morphosemantics of number
|Title:||Goidelic inherent plurals and the morphosemantics of number||Authors:||Acquaviva, Paolo||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4182||Date:||Nov-2006||Online since:||2013-03-14T16:58:34Z||Abstract:||After numbers above 2, nouns are singular or plural depending on the language. But in Irish and Scottish some nouns must be singular and others plural, in a variety of dialectal patterns. Once the semantic basis underlying all these patterns is clarified, the ‘‘irregular’’ distribution of number in Goidelic fits neatly into the typological pattern of classifier constructions. Number seems arbitrary in some constructions, because that is where nouns are interpreted as transnumerals: apparent singulars are just numberless, and plurals are inherently plural stems. This provides a unified explanation for a host of constructions beside numeratives, and affords a deeper understanding of the way aspects of lexical semantics are encoded by number morphology.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Elsevier||Journal:||Lingua||Volume:||116||Issue:||11||Start page:||1860||End page:||1887||Copyright (published version):||2005 Published by Elsevier B.V.||Keywords:||Plural; Irish; Scottish; Morphology; Semantics||DOI:||10.1016/j.lingua.2004.10.003||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Languages, Cultures and Linguistics Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.