Focus groups versus individual interviews with children : A comparison of data

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
IJPHearyHennessy2006.doc109.5 kBMicrosoft WordDownload
Title: Focus groups versus individual interviews with children : A comparison of data
Authors: Heary, Caroline
Hennessy, Eilis
Permanent link:
Date: 2006
Abstract: In recent years there has been an increase in the use of qualitative data collection techniques in research with children. Among the most common of these methods are focus groups and individual interviews. While many authors claim that focus groups have advantages over individual interviews, these claims have not been tested empirically with children. The present study reports on the use of focus groups and interviews to collect qualitative data from 116 children in three age groups, with mean ages of 8.4, 11.5 and 14.3 years. The children were randomly allocated to participate in either focus groups or individual interviews where they were presented with identical material and questions relating to their beliefs about peers with psychological disorders. In line with previous research, the interviews produced significantly more relevant and unique ideas about the causes of these disorders than the focus groups, but the latter gave rise to greater elaboration of ideas. The participating children showed no significant difference in their preference for one method over the other. Thus, whether to choose individual interviews or focus groups is likely to depend on the nature of the research question in any given study.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Routledge (Taylor & Francis)
Journal: The Irish Journal of Psychology
Volume: 27
Issue: 1-2
Start page: 58
End page: 68
Copyright (published version): 2006, Routledge
Keywords: ChildrenFocus groupsInterviewsResearch methods
DOI: 10.1080/03033910.2006.10446228
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
ISBN: 0953101983 2013-04-15T13:49:19Z
Appears in Collections:Psychology Research Collection

Show full item record

Citations 20

Last Week
Last month
checked on Dec 12, 2018

Google ScholarTM



This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.