Altered endometrial immune gene expression in beef heifers with retarded embryos
|Title:||Altered endometrial immune gene expression in beef heifers with retarded embryos||Authors:||Beltman, Marijke Eileen
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4665||Date:||Oct-2012||Online since:||2013-10-02T08:45:17Z||Abstract:||The aim of the present study was to compare endometrial gene expression profiles in a group of beef heifers yielding viable or retarded embryos on Day 7 after oestrus as a means of potentially explaining differences in embryo survival rates. Heifers were classified as either: (1) viable, when the embryo collected on Day 7 after oestrus was at the correct developmental stage (i.e. morula/early blastocyst); or (2) retarded, when the embryo was arrested at the 2–16-cell stage. The focus of the present study was on genes that were associated with either the pro- or anti-inflammatory immune response. Endometrial gene expression was determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. Expression of the β-defensin (DEFB1), interferon (IFN)-α (IFNA), IFN-γ (IFNG), interleukin (IL)-6 (IL6), IL-10 (IL10), forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) and natural cytotoxicity triggering receptor 1 (NCR1) genes was lower in endometria from viable than retarded heifers. Expression of the nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B cells 1 (NKFB1), transforming growth factor (TGF)-β (TGFB), IFN-γ-inducible protein 16 (IFI16) and IL-21 (IL21) genes was higher in viable than retarded heifers. We propose that small disturbances in the expression of immune genes in the endometrium on Day 7 after oestrus can have detrimental effects on embryo survival.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||CSIRO Publishing||Journal:||Reproduction Fertility and Development||Volume:||25||Issue:||6||Start page:||966||End page:||970||Copyright (published version):||2012 CSIRO PUBLISHING||Keywords:||Anti-inflammatory; Embryo development; Pre-implantation; Pro-inflammatory; Uterus||DOI:||10.1071/RD12232||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Veterinary Medicine Research Collection|
Show full item record
Page view(s) 5095
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.