Motorcycle riders’ perception of helmet use: Complaints and dissatisfaction

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Paper_rivisto (SEND AS PDF NOT DONE) done.pdf245.67 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Motorcycle riders’ perception of helmet use: Complaints and dissatisfaction
Authors: Orsi, C.
Stendardo, A.
Marinoni, A.
et al.
Permanent link:
Date: Jan-2012
Abstract: In accidents which involve two-wheeled vehicles the helmet plays a life-saving role, but very little is known about the motorcycle rider's perception of the helmet. We evaluated the relationships between having been involved in an accident and dissatisfaction with the helmet, and between the perception of motorcycle riders and the objective features of the helmet. This was a case–control study: riders of motorized two-wheelers who had been involved in accidents (accident cases) were compared against a similarly interviewed sample of riders that had not been in accidents (control cases). Information about the driver, the vehicle and the helmet was collected in all interviews. To evaluate the relationships, logistic regressions were carried out. The majority of drivers were dissatisfied with their helmets, but no evidence was found to link this dissatisfaction with having been involved in an accident. The two most common complaints related to noisiness, followed by the helmet visor. Complaints did not seem to be statistically associated with physical features of the helmet.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Accident Analysis & Prevention
Volume: 44
Issue: 1
Start page: 111
End page: 117
Copyright (published version): 2012 Elsevier
Keywords: HelmetMotorcycle accidentCognitive abilityCase control studyPreventionRoad safety
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.029
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Mechanical & Materials Engineering Research Collection

Show full item record

Citations 20

Last Week
Last month
checked on Sep 17, 2018

Page view(s) 50

checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 20

checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM



This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.