Predictions of settlement in peat soils

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1DCompPeat_PreProof.pdf714.5 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Predictions of settlement in peat soils
Authors: Long, Michael (Michael M.)
Boylan, Noel
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4883
Date: 8-Aug-2013
Abstract: Predictions from laboratory tests of the compression behaviour of peat from 14 sites are compared with full-scale field loading at five sites. Data presented confirm the heterogeneous nature of the deposits. However, for typical engineering works, calculations based on laboratory test data are likely to give reasonable predictions of the magnitude of immediate and primary compression. Standard (20 mm thickness) samples may give misleading data on time for primary consolidation. Thicker samples (e.g. 50 mm) should be used. Sampling by conventional samplers, as used for mineral soils, can cause densification of the peat, resulting in underestimation of actual settlement. Block samples or sample tubes with serrated cutting edges are recommended for peat soils. It was found that the data presented follow the Cα/Cc law of compressibility. There is also is some evidence to suggest that the H2 scaling law may be applicable. Good correlations were found between vertical yield stress (pvy′) and compression index (Cc) and index parameters such as water content (wi). Conventional staged construction with surcharge loading may be successfully applied to peat soils as long as adequate drainage exists to permit consolidation over reasonable time intervals.
Funding Details: Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Geological Society of London
Copyright (published version): 2013 Geological Society of London
Keywords: Peat;1D Compression;Field data
DOI: 10.1144/qjegh2011-063
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Civil Engineering Research Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

11
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jun 22, 2018

Page view(s) 10

180
checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 10

828
checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.