Dialogism in Corporate Social Responsibility Communications: Conceptualising Verbal Interactions between Organisations and their Audiences
Files in This Item:
|04_30_Brennan_Merkl-Davies_Beelitz_Dialogism_and_Intertextuality_in_CSR.pdf||776.31 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Dialogism in Corporate Social Responsibility Communications: Conceptualising Verbal Interactions between Organisations and their Audiences||Authors:||Brennan, Niamh
Merkl-Davies, Doris M.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4948||Date:||Jul-2013||Online since:||2014-07-31T03:00:08Z||Abstract:||We conceptualise CSR communication as a process of reciprocal influence between organisations and their audiences. We use an illustrative case study in the form of a conflict between firms and a powerful stakeholder which is played out in a series of 20 press releases over a 2-month period to develop a framework of analysis based on insights from linguistics. It focuses on three aspects of dialogism, namely (i) turn-taking (co-operating in a conversation by responding to the other party), (ii) inter-party moves (the nature and type of interaction characterising a turn, i.e. denial, apology or excuse) and (iii) intertextuality (the intensity and quality of verbal interaction between the parties). We address the question: What is the nature and type of verbal interactions between the parties? First we examine (a) whether the parties verbally interact and then (b) whether the parties listen to each other. We find evidence of dialogism suggesting that CSR communication is an interactive process which has to be understood as a function of the power relations between a firm and a specific stakeholder. Also, we find evidence of intertextuality in press releases by six firms which engage in verbal interaction with the stakeholder. We interpret this as linguistic evidence of isomorphic processes relating to CSR practices resulting from the pressure exerted by a powerful stakeholder. The lack of response by ten firms that fail to issue press releases suggests a strategy of ‘watch-and-wait’ with respect to the outcome of the conflict.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Springer||Journal:||Journal of Business Ethics||Volume:||115||Issue:||4||Start page:||665||End page:||679||Copyright (published version):||2013, Springer Netherlands||Keywords:||Dialogism; Interaction; Intertextuality; CSR communication||DOI:||10.1007/s10551-013-1825-9||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Business Research Collection|
UCD RePEc Archive Collection
Show full item record
Page view(s) 5097
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.