Problematising Practice: MacIntyre and Management
Files in This Item:
|Organization_Final_Version.pdf||219.61 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Problematising Practice: MacIntyre and Management||Authors:||Kavanagh, Donncha||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4964||Date:||Jan-2013||Abstract:||Alasdair MacIntyre's distinction between institutions and practices helps illuminate how powerful institutional forces frame and constrain the practice of organizational research as well as the output and positioning of scholarly journals like Organization. Yet his conceptual frame is limited, not least because it is unclear whether the activity of managing is, or is not, a practice. This paper builds on MacIntyre's ideas by incorporating Aristotle's concepts of poíēsis, praxis, téchnē and phrónēsis. Rather than ask, following MacIntyre, whether management is a practice, this wider network of concepts provides a richer frame for understanding the nature of managing and the appropriate role for academia. The paper outlines a phronetic paradigm for organizational inquiry, and concludes by briefly examining the implications of such a paradigm for research and learning.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Sage||Copyright (published version):||The Author(s) 2012||Keywords:||MacIntyre;Ethics;Management;Phronesis;Praxis;Practice;Virtue ethics||DOI:||10.1177/1350508412460994||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Business Research Collection|
Show full item record
Page view(s) 5081
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.