Recommendations for Biomarker Identification and Qualification in Clinical Proteomics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Paper129.pdf120.42 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Recommendations for Biomarker Identification and Qualification in Clinical Proteomics
Authors: Mischak, H.
Allmaier, G.
Apweiler, R.
et al.
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5014
Date: 25-Aug-2010
Abstract: Clinical proteomics has yielded some early positive results—the identification of potential disease biomarkers—indicating the promise for this analytical approach to improve the current state of the art in clinical practice. However, the inability to verify some candidate molecules in subsequent studies has led to skepticism among many clinicians and regulatory bodies, and it has become evident that commonly encountered shortcomings in fundamental aspects of experimental design mainly during biomarker discovery must be addressed in order to provide robust data. In this Perspective, we assert that successful studies generally use suitable statistical approaches for biomarker definition and confirm results in independent test sets; in addition, we describe a brief set of practical and feasible recommendations that we have developed for investigators to properly identify and qualify proteomic biomarkers, which could also be used as reporting requirements. Such recommendations should help put proteomic biomarker discovery on the solid ground needed for turning the old promise into a new reality.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Copyright (published version): 2010 American Association for the Advancement of Science
Keywords: biomarker definition;Biomarker Identification;Clinical Proteomics
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001249
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:SBI Research Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 1

167
Last Week
7
Last month
checked on Jun 23, 2018

Page view(s) 50

45
checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 5

1,265
checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.