Differential outcomes to a pain management programme based on coping style

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Pain_2010x.pdf274.17 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Differential outcomes to a pain management programme based on coping style
Authors: McMorrow, Eva
Walsh, Rosemary
O'Keeffe, Declan
Dooley, Barbara A.
Guerin, Suzanne
Carr, Alan
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5183
Date: 2010
Abstract: The study objectives were to investigate whether a heterogeneous sample of Irish chronic pain patients could be classified into subgroups using the Multidimensional Pain Inventory to profile the subgroups’ experiences of pain and distress, and to compare their responses to a multidisciplinary pain management programme. Ninety chronic pain patients completed the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) before and after a multidisciplinary pain management programme and at 6–23 months follow-up. Eighty-eight percent of patients were classified as Dysfunctional (DYS), Interpersonally Distressed (ID), or Adaptive Coper (AC) on the basis of their responses to the MPI. The proportions of patients classified into the three MPI groups were similar to those found in previous studies: 21% were AC, 20% were ID, and 47% were DYS. The three groups differed significantly in their levels of pre-treatment pain and distress. Compared with the AC group, the DYS group had greater pain and both the DYS and ID groups had greater distress. For measures of pain intensity and interference, from pre- to post-treatment, the DYS group improved significantly more than the AC group, but for pain intensity, the DYS group had relapsed at follow-up and the AC group’s interference scores had significantly improved. All patients who participated in the programme showed significant improvement in depression and the sense of control they had over their lives; this improvement was partially maintained at follow-up; and participants expressed a high level of satisfaction with all aspects of the programme. In conclusion, Irish chronic pain patients are not a homogeneous group and may be classified into subgroups based on psychological factors. Treatment response may be related to subgroup membership. Future research should evaluate whether tailoring treatments to patient characteristics will improve treatment outcome.
Funding Details: Other funder
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Routledge (Taylor & Francis)
Copyright (published version): 2010 The Psychological Society of Ireland
Keywords: Pain management programme;MPI;MPQ
DOI: 10.1080/03033910.2010.10446319
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Psychology Research Collection

Show full item record

Page view(s) 50

69
checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 50

113
checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.