Population estimation and trappability of the European badger (Meles meles): implications for tuberculosis management
Files in This Item:
|Byrne_et_al._2012_PLoSOne.pdf||431.82 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Population estimation and trappability of the European badger (Meles meles): implications for tuberculosis management||Authors:||Byrne, Andrew W.
Corner, L. A. (Leigh Austin)
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5252||Date:||5-Dec-2012||Abstract:||Estimates of population size and trappability inform vaccine efficacy modelling and are required for adaptive management during prolonged wildlife vaccination campaigns. We present an analysis of mark-recapture data from a badger vaccine (Bacille Calmette-Guérin) study in Ireland. This study is the largest scale (755 km²) mark-recapture study ever undertaken with this species. The study area was divided into three approximately equal-sized zones, each with similar survey and capture effort. A mean badger population size of 671 (SD: 76) was estimated using a closed-subpopulation model (CSpM) based on data from capturing sessions of the entire area and was consistent with a separate multiplicative model. Minimum number alive estimates calculated from the same data were on average 49-51% smaller than the CSpM estimates, but these are considered severely negatively biased when trappability is low. Population densities derived from the CSpM estimates were 0.82-1.06 badgers kmˉ², and broadly consistent with previous reports for an adjacent area. Mean trappability was estimated to be 34-35% per session across the population. By the fifth capture session, 79% of the adult badgers caught had been marked previously. Multivariable modelling suggested significant differences in badger trappability depending on zone, season and age-class. There were more putatively trap-wary badgers identified in the population than trap-happy badgers, but wariness was not related to individual's sex, zone or season of capture. Live-trapping efficacy can vary significantly amongst sites, seasons, age, or personality, hence monitoring of trappability is recommended as part of an adaptive management regime during large-scale wildlife vaccination programs to counter biases and to improve efficiencies.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Public Library of Science||Journal:||PLoS ONE||Volume:||7||Start page:||e50807||Copyright (published version):||2012 Byrne et al.||Keywords:||Badger; Mark-recapture; Trappability||DOI:||10.1371/journal.pone.0050807||Other versions:||http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0050807||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Veterinary Medicine Research Collection|
Show full item record
Page view(s) 5071
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.