Options
A study of the differential effects of Tomm's questioning styles on therapeutic alliance
Author(s)
Date Issued
2001-01
Date Available
2014-01-28T09:52:08Z
Abstract
To replicate and extend Dozier et al's (1992) test of Tomm’s hypothesis about the differential effects of
questioning styles on therapeutic alliance an analogue study was conducted. Twenty-eight family triads,
each including a son and his parents, viewed four videotaped simulated family therapy scenarios in which
Tomm's four questioning styles were separately portrayed. Participants were asked to identify with the client
whose role corresponded to theirs (i.e. father, mother, or son) and, on the basis of this, to rate the client’s
alliance with the therapist. They were also asked to rate the overall alliance between the family and the
therapist. Finally, having viewed all four scenarios, they were invited to comparatively rate the quality of the
therapeutic alliance across the four questioning styles. Compared with strategic and lineal questioning styles,
circular and reflexive questions led to higher ratings of therapeutic alliance on all three measures. The results
of this study support Tomm's hypothesis that questioning styles based on circular assumptions lead to a
better a therapeutic alliance at an individual and systemic level than questions based on lineal assumptions.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Journal
Family Process
Volume
40
Issue
1
Start Page
67
End Page
77
Copyright (Published Version)
2001 Wiley-Blackwell
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Owning collection
Scopus© citations
24
Acquisition Date
Mar 28, 2024
Mar 28, 2024
Views
1674
Acquisition Date
Mar 28, 2024
Mar 28, 2024
Downloads
818
Last Week
4
4
Last Month
12
12
Acquisition Date
Mar 28, 2024
Mar 28, 2024