A study of the differential effects of Tomm's questioning styles on therapeutic alliance

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FT-Tomm's Questioning style 2001x.pdf217.15 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: A study of the differential effects of Tomm's questioning styles on therapeutic alliance
Authors: Ryan, Dermot
Carr, Alan
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5298
Date: Jan-2001
Abstract: To replicate and extend Dozier et al's (1992) test of Tomm’s hypothesis about the differential effects of questioning styles on therapeutic alliance an analogue study was conducted. Twenty-eight family triads, each including a son and his parents, viewed four videotaped simulated family therapy scenarios in which Tomm's four questioning styles were separately portrayed. Participants were asked to identify with the client whose role corresponded to theirs (i.e. father, mother, or son) and, on the basis of this, to rate the client’s alliance with the therapist. They were also asked to rate the overall alliance between the family and the therapist. Finally, having viewed all four scenarios, they were invited to comparatively rate the quality of the therapeutic alliance across the four questioning styles. Compared with strategic and lineal questioning styles, circular and reflexive questions led to higher ratings of therapeutic alliance on all three measures. The results of this study support Tomm's hypothesis that questioning styles based on circular assumptions lead to a better a therapeutic alliance at an individual and systemic level than questions based on lineal assumptions.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Copyright (published version): 2001 Wiley-Blackwell
Keywords: Circular questions;Systemic therapy;Reflexive questions;Interventive interviewing
DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2001.4010100067.x
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Psychology Research Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

12
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jun 22, 2018

Page view(s) 50

40
checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 20

292
checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.