The Beavers, McMaster and Circumplex Clinical Rating Scales: A study of their sensitivity, specificity and discriminant validity

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FT-3Models_2000x.pdf213.24 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: The Beavers, McMaster and Circumplex Clinical Rating Scales: A study of their sensitivity, specificity and discriminant validity
Authors: Drumm, Michael
Carr, Alan
Fitzgerald, Michael
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5300
Date: May-2000
Abstract: To asses the sensitivity and specificity of clinical rating scales from the Beavers, McMaster and Circumplex models of family functioning videotapes of 60 families engaging in a standardized family task interview were rated using the three rating scales. The 60 families included 20 containing a child with an emotional disorder, 20 containing a child with a mixed disorder of emotions and conduct; and 20 in which none of the children presented with clinically significant difficulties. The three rating scales accurately classified 85-90% of normal controls; 70-90% of cases containing a child with a mixed disorder of emotions and conduct; and 55-65% of families containing a child with an emotional disorder. On the rating scales, the Beavers and McMaster models showed particularly high levels of sensitivity in detecting clinical cases, whereas the Circumplex rating scale was particularly good at classifying nonclinical cases accurately.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Copyright (published version): 2000 Wiley-Blackwell
Keywords: Circumplex rating scale;Beavers model;McMaster model;Circumplex model
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6427.00148
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Psychology Research Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

10
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jun 22, 2018

Page view(s) 50

57
checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 50

129
checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.