Three Pragmatisms: Putnam, Rorty and Brandom

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Three_Pragmatisms.pdf162.87 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Three Pragmatisms: Putnam, Rorty and Brandom
Authors: Baghramian, Maria
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5610
Date: 2008
Abstract: Over the last several decades an increasing number of philosophers have announced their sympathies for or have become affiliated with what has become known as neo-pragmatism. The connection between the various strands of pragmatism, new and old, however, remains quite unclear. This paper attempts to shed some light on this issue by focusing on a debate between Hilary Putnam and Robert Brandom on classical and contemporary pragmatisms. Using the Brandom-Putnam debate as my starting point, I examine the relationship between the pragmatisms of Putnam and Rorty, two of the most influential neopragmatists, and argue that differing conceptions of the normative are at the heart of their disagreement. I further argue that this disagreement has similarities to, and can be illuminated by, two differing conceptions of norms in Wittgenstein’s work. I conclude that Brandom does not delineate the differences between various strands of pragmatism convincingly.
Type of material: Book Chapter
Publisher: Rodopi
Copyright (published version): 2008 Editions Rodopi B. V.
Keywords: Pragmatism;Hilary Putnam;Robert Brandom
Language: en
Status of Item: Not peer reviewed
Is part of: Monroy, María Uxía Rivas et al. (eds.). Following Putnam's Trail: On Realism and Other Issues
Appears in Collections:Philosophy Research Collection

Show full item record

Page view(s) 50

64
checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 10

891
checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.