Talk and Silence: Instantiations and Articulations
|Title:||Talk and Silence: Instantiations and Articulations||Authors:||Kuhling, Carmen
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5812||Date:||Jan-2003||Online since:||2014-08-15T15:03:08Z||Abstract:||This paper considers the desire for unity, reconciliation and consensus underpinning three models of talking – namely, 'the meeting', 'the dyadic love relationship', and 'the psychoanalytic session'. We highlight the three domains’ shared intellectual and historical heritage wherein talk is seen as a mode of achieving unity (of the group, of the dyad, or of the self) and conversely 'silence' is seen as pathology. Through looking at the role of silence in the works of Lacan, Joyce, and Beckett, we then examine how conversations with a collective, an Other, the self, etc. can all be enriched by ambivalence, antagonism and, in particular, silence. In contrast to the conventional understanding, silence is not the 'end' of understanding, but rather a new beginning. From this perspective, silence can be the basis upon which we can begin to imagine a principled relationship with the Other.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Ephemera||Journal:||Ephemera||Volume:||3||Issue:||4||Start page:||288||End page:||305||Series/Report no.:||Critical Dialogues on Organization: Silent Sounds #4||Copyright (published version):||2003 Ephemera||Keywords:||Interpersonal relations; Talk; Communication; Silence||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Business Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.