Beyond MacIntyre: Grounding the business as practice debate

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
F44_IAM_2012_.pdf152.83 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Beyond MacIntyre: Grounding the business as practice debate
Authors: Kavanagh, Donncha
Permanent link:
Date: Sep-2012
Online since: 2014-08-15T15:12:17Z
Abstract: Alasdair MacIntyre’s distinction between institutions and practices helps illuminate how powerful institutional forces frame and constrain the practice of organizational research as well as the output and positioning of scholarly journals. Yet his conceptual frame is limited, not least because it is unclear whether the activity of managing is, or is not, a practice. This paper builds on MacIntyre’s ideas by incorporating Aristotle’s concepts of poíēsis, praxis, téchnē and phrónēsis. Rather than ask, following MacIntyre, whether management is a practice, this wider network of concepts provides a richer frame for understanding the nature of managing and the appropriate role for academia. The paper outlines a phronetic paradigm for organizational inquiry, and concludes by briefly examining the implications of such a paradigm for research and learning.
Type of material: Conference Publication
Copyright (published version): 2012 the Author
Keywords: MacIntyre, Alasdair C.Management studiesInstitutionsPractices
Language: en
Status of Item: Not peer reviewed
Conference Details: Irish Academy of Management Annual Conference, Maynooth, Ireland, 5-7 September, 2012
Appears in Collections:Business Research Collection

Show full item record

Page view(s) 50

Last Week
Last month
checked on Jun 5, 2020


checked on Jun 5, 2020

Google ScholarTM


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.