Evaluating Strategies to Normalise Biological Replicates of Western Blot Data
Files in This Item:
|DegasperiEtAl2014_PLOSONE.pdf||578.9 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Evaluating Strategies to Normalise Biological Replicates of Western Blot Data||Authors:||Degasperi, Andrea
Birtwistle, Marc R.
Kholodenko, Boris N.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5844||Date:||27-Jan-2014||Abstract:||Western blot data are widely used in quantitative applications such as statistical testing and mathematical modelling. To ensure accurate quantitation and comparability between experiments, Western blot replicates must be normalised, but it is unclear how the available methods affect statistical properties of the data. Here we evaluate three commonly used normalisation strategies: (i) by fixed normalisation point or control; (ii) by sum of all data points in a replicate; and (iii) by optimal alignment of the replicates. We consider how these different strategies affect the coefficient of variation (CV) and the results of hypothesis testing with the normalised data. Normalisation by fixed point tends to increase the mean CV of normalised data in a manner that naturally depends on the choice of the normalisation point. Thus, in the context of hypothesis testing, normalisation by fixed point reduces false positives and increases false negatives. Analysis of published experimental data shows that choosing normalisation points with low quantified intensities results in a high normalised data CV and should thus be avoided. Normalisation by sum or by optimal alignment redistributes the raw data uncertainty in a mean-dependent manner, reducing the CV of high intensity points and increasing the CV of low intensity points. This causes the effect of normalisations by sum or optimal alignment on hypothesis testing to depend on the mean of the data tested; for high intensity points, false positives are increased and false negatives are decreased, while for low intensity points, false positives are decreased and false negatives are increased. These results will aid users of Western blotting to choose a suitable normalisation strategy and also understand the implications of this normalisation for subsequent hypothesis testing.||Funding Details:||Science Foundation Ireland||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||PLOS||Copyright (published version):||2014 Degasperi et al.||Keywords:||Western blot; Systems Biology; Linearity; ECL; Variability; Coefficient of Variation; Normalisation; T-test; Quantitative western blotting; Hypothesis testing; Linear range; Enhanced chemiluminescence; Fluorescent secondary antibody; Normalisation point; Signal-to-noise||DOI:||10.1371/journal.pone.0087293||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||SBI Research Collection|
Show full item record
Page view(s) 5049
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.