The writ of certiorari and review of summary criminal convictions, 1660-1848
Files in This Item:
|lqrjan2012The_writ_of_certiorari_and_review_of_summary_criminal_convictions.doc||142.5 kB||Microsoft Word||Download|
|Title:||The writ of certiorari and review of summary criminal convictions, 1660-1848||Authors:||Costello, Kevin||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/6164||Date:||Jul-2012||Abstract:||Judicial review now accounts for over one third of the applications submitted to the Queen’s Bench Division. Judicial review has ascended to this point of high prominence over the course of a four hundred year history. That history is the story of the progress since the sixteenth century of the prerogative writs – particularly certiorari and mandamus. Of these prerogative writs, it is certiorari which has the closest connection with the modern process of judicial review. In the early part of its history, from the seventeenth century to the end of the eighteenth century, the writ issued against a wide range of orders made by justices of the peace and specialist agencies like commissioners of sewers. The particular focus of this study is upon its use as a means of invalidating summary convictions.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Sweet and Maxwell||Keywords:||Legal history;Certiorari||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Law Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.