Greenfield versus Merger & Acquisition FDI: Same Wine, Different Bottles?
|Title:||Greenfield versus Merger & Acquisition FDI: Same Wine, Different Bottles?||Authors:||Davies, Ronald B.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/6365||Date:||Feb-2015||Abstract:||Relying on a large foreign direct investment (FDI) transaction level dataset, unique both in terms of disaggregation and time and country coverage, this paper examines patterns in greenfield (GF) versus merger & acquisition (MA) investment. Although both are found to seek out large markets with low international barriers, important differences emerge. MA is more affected by geographic and cultural barriers and exhibits opportunistic behaviours as it is more sensitive to short-run changes, such as a currency crisis. On the other hand, GF is relatively driven by long-run factors, such as origincountry technological and institutional development or comparative advantage. These empirical facts are consistent with the conceptual distinction made between these two modes, i.e. MA involves transfer of ownership for integration or arbitrage reasons while GF relies on firms own capacities, which are linked to the origin countries attributes. They also suggest that GF and MA are likely to respond differently to policies intended to attract FDI.||Type of material:||Working Paper||Publisher:||University College Dublin. School of Economics||Copyright (published version):||2015 the authors||Keywords:||Foreign Direct Investment;Mergers and Acquisitions;Greenfield Investment;Multinational Firms||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Not peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Economics Working Papers & Policy Papers|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.