Challenging Exchange Programs: Studying the Common Law and Civil Law Systems in a Joint Law Degree
Files in This Item:
|Challenging Exchange Programmes _Research Repository UCD_.pdf||154.46 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Challenging Exchange Programs: Studying the Common Law and Civil Law Systems in a Joint Law Degree||Authors:||Paris, Marie-Luce||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/6442||Date:||Apr-2009||Abstract:||The demands of globalization have put greater pressure to internationalize the university law curriculum in order to prepare students as lawyers. This is particularly relevant in the context of the European Union. A particularly challenging type of programme regarded as a potentially useful tool to further the internationalization and integration of European higher education and to make the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) a reality is the joint degree. It is broadly defined as a degree awarded on the basis of completion of a study programme established and provided jointly by two or more higher education institutions, normally located in different countries. This paper offers a case study on a particular joint law degree which involves the study of the two major legal systems of common law and civil law – namely the University College Dublin Bachelor of Civil Law/Maîtrise (Irish/English law and French law) Degree. While emphasis is put on the challenges and benefits of teaching and learning in such a degree, the experience is put into perspective with other exchange programmes involving French legal studies. Sustaining a whole range of exchange programmes in a law school prompts wider reflections on how to meet the paradoxical challenge of diversity and integration in the context of European legal education.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||European Law Faculties Association||Keywords:||Curriculum design; Diversity; Double degree; Dual degree; European Higher Education Area; French law; Joint degree; Legal education; Legal terminology||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Law Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.