A Computational Theory of Subjective Probability [Featuring a Proof that the Conjunction Effect is not a Fallacy]

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
insight_publication.pdf149.6 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: A Computational Theory of Subjective Probability [Featuring a Proof that the Conjunction Effect is not a Fallacy]
Authors: Maguire, Phil
Moser, Philippe
Maguire, Rebecca
Keane, Mark T.
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/6791
Date: 3-Aug-2013
Online since: 2015-08-13T09:25:47Z
Abstract: In this article we demonstrate how algorithmic probability theory is applied to situations that involve uncertainty. When people are unsure of their model of reality, then the outcome they observe will cause them to update their beliefs. We argue that classical probability cannot be applied in such cases, and that subjective probability must instead be used. In Experiment 1 we show that, when judging the probability of lottery number sequences, people apply subjective rather than classical probability. In Experiment 2 we examine the conjunction fallacy and demonstrate that the materials used by Tverksy and Kahneman(1983) involve model uncertainty. We then provide a formal mathematical proof that, for every uncertain model, there exists a conjunction of outcomes which is more subjectively probable than either of its constituents in isolation.
Type of material: Conference Publication
Publisher: Cognitive Science Society
Copyright (published version): 2013 the Authors
Keywords: Media analyticsConjunction fallacyAlgorithmic statisticsLikelihood judgmentsSurpriseSubjective probability
Other versions: http://cognitivesciencesociety.org/conference2013/index.html
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Conference Details: 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Berlin, Germany, 31 July - 3 August 2013
Appears in Collections:Insight Research Collection

Show full item record

Download(s) 50

checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.