Cognitive Residues of Similarity: 'After-Effects' of Similarity Computations in Visual Search
|Title:||Cognitive Residues of Similarity: 'After-Effects' of Similarity Computations in Visual Search||Authors:||O'Toole, Stephanie
Keane, Mark T.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/6855||Date:||3-Aug-2013||Online since:||2015-08-28T18:22:48Z||Abstract:||What are the 'cognitive after-effects' of making a similarity judgement? What, cognitively, is left behind and what effect might these residues have on subsequent processing? In this paper, we probe for such after-effects using a visual searcht ask, performed after a task in which pictures of real-world objects were compared. So, target objects were first presented in a comparison task (e.g., rate the similarity of this object to another) thus, presumably, modifying some of their features before asking people to visually search for the same object in complex scenes (with distractors and camouflaged backgrounds). As visual search is known to be influenced by the features of target objects, then any after effects of the comparison task should be revealed insubsequent visual searches. Results showed that when people previously rated an object as being high on a scale(e.g., colour similarity or general similarity) then visual search is inhibited (slower RTs and more saccades in eye tracking)relative to an object being rated as low in the same scale. There was also some evidence that different comparison tasks (e.g., compare on colour or compare on general similarity) have differential effects on visual search.||Type of material:||Conference Publication||Copyright (published version):||2013 the Authors||Keywords:||Media analytics; Visual-search; Similarity; Eye-tracking||Other versions:||http://cognitivesciencesociety.org/conference2013/index.html||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed||Conference Details:||Thirty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Berlin, Germany, July 31 - August 3 2013|
|Appears in Collections:||Computer Science Research Collection|
Insight Research Collection
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.