Files in This Item:
|SpontaneousAccountability.pdf||213.1 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Spontaneous Accountability||Authors:||Scott, Colin||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7021||Date:||Jul-2006||Abstract:||Contemporary ideas about governance are dominated by a loss of faith in both hierarchical modes of control and state-centric conceptions of governing. This tendency has caused both scholars and public policy makers to search for evidence that other modes and loci of control are or might be effective in supplementing or replacing hierarchy and the state. These other modes include governance through networks and communities, governance through competition and markets, and governance through architecture.||Type of material:||Book Chapter||Publisher:||Cambridge University Press||Journal:||Dowdle, M.W. (ed.). Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemma and Experiences||Start page:||174||End page:||191||Keywords:||Accountability; Governance||Other versions:||http://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/law/constitutional-and-administrative-law/public-accountability-designs-dilemmas-and-experiences?format=PB||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed||Is part of:||Dowdle, M. (ed.). Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences||ISBN:||9780521617611|
|Appears in Collections:||Law Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.