Judicial Oversight of Surveillance: The Case of Ireland in Comparative Perspective
Files in This Item:
|TJ_McIntyre_Judicial_Oversight_of_Surveillance-_The_Case_of_Ireland_in_Comparative_Perspective.pdf||574.83 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Judicial Oversight of Surveillance: The Case of Ireland in Comparative Perspective||Authors:||McIntyre, T. J.||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7363||Date:||Apr-2016||Abstract:||This chapter examines how judicial oversight can regulate secret state surveillance, with a particular focus on Irish, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and European Union (EU) law. It begins by considering the general arguments for judicial oversight and the types of oversight structures which can be used. It then examines the extent to which Irish, ECHR and EU law require judicial oversight in particular circumstances. Next, it takes as a case study the Irish experience of data retention. It concludes with suggestions for improving the effectiveness of judicial involvement in surveillance.||Type of material:||Book Chapter||Publisher:||Edward Elgar||Copyright (published version):||2016 Edward Elgar||Keywords:||Digital Rights Ireland;Surveillance;Privacy;Judicial oversight;Warrant;Interception of communications;Data retention||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Not peer reviewed||Is part of:||Scheinin, M., Krunke, H. and Aksenova, M. (eds.). Judges as Guardians of Constitutionalism and Human Rights|
|Appears in Collections:||Law Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.