Judicial Oversight of Surveillance: The Case of Ireland in Comparative Perspective

Title: Judicial Oversight of Surveillance: The Case of Ireland in Comparative Perspective
Authors: McIntyre, T. J.
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7363
Date: Apr-2016
Abstract: This chapter examines how judicial oversight can regulate secret state surveillance, with a particular focus on Irish, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and European Union (EU) law. It begins by considering the general arguments for judicial oversight and the types of oversight structures which can be used. It then examines the extent to which Irish, ECHR and EU law require judicial oversight in particular circumstances. Next, it takes as a case study the Irish experience of data retention. It concludes with suggestions for improving the effectiveness of judicial involvement in surveillance.
Type of material: Book Chapter
Publisher: Edward Elgar
Copyright (published version): 2016 Edward Elgar
Keywords: Digital Rights Ireland;Surveillance;Privacy;Judicial oversight;Warrant;Interception of communications;Data retention
Language: en
Status of Item: Not peer reviewed
Is part of: Scheinin, M., Krunke, H. and Aksenova, M. (eds.). Judges as Guardians of Constitutionalism and Human Rights
Appears in Collections:Law Research Collection

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.