Learning from patient safety incidents in incident review meetings: Organisational factors and indicators of analytic process effectiveness

Files in This Item:
Access to this item has been restricted by the copyright holder until:2018-12-01
File Description SizeFormat 
SafSci_anderson&kodate_2015_Repository.docx69.71 kBMicrosoft WordDownload    Request a copy
Title: Learning from patient safety incidents in incident review meetings: Organisational factors and indicators of analytic process effectiveness
Authors: Anderson, Janet E.
Kodate, Naonori
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7439
Date: Dec-2015
Abstract: Learning from patient safety incidents is difficult; information is often incomplete, and it is not clear which incidents are preventable or which intervention strategies are optimal. Effective group processes are vital for learning but few studies in healthcare have examined in depth the processes involved and whether they are effective. The aims of this study were to identify factors that facilitated and hindered the process of analysing incidents in teams and to develop and apply a framework of indicators of effective analytic processes. Incident review meetings in acute care and mental health care were observed. Full field notes were analysed thematically. A framework of process measures was developed and used to rate each meeting using the field notes. Reliability was analysed. Factors hindering analysis were lack of organisational support, high workload and a managerial, autocratic leadership style. Facilitating factors were participatory interactions and strong safety leadership. Process measures showed deficits in critiquing the causes of incidents, seeking further information, critiquing potential solutions and solving problems that crossed organisational boundaries, supporting observational data on the importance of effective leadership. Organisational legitimacy, administrative support, training, tools for incident analysis, effective well trained leaders who empower the team and sufficient resources to manage the high workload were all identified in this study as necessary changes to improve learning. Future studies could develop and validate the proposed framework of process indicators to provide a tool for teams to use as an aid to improve the analysis of incidents.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Elsevier
Copyright (published version): 2015 Elsevier
Keywords: Incident reporting;Organisational learning;Leadership;Patient safety;Incident review meetings;Safety leadership
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.07.012
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice Research Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

7
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jun 22, 2018

Page view(s) 1

912
Last Week
3
Last month
checked on Jun 24, 2018

Download(s)

2
checked on Jun 24, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.