Soil nailing optimisation: lost opportunities in current practice
|Title:||Soil nailing optimisation: lost opportunities in current practice||Authors:||Laefer, Debra F.
Ó Murchú, Oisín
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7698||Date:||29-Aug-2014||Online since:||2016-06-24T13:50:05Z||Abstract:||This paper analyses 127 cases histories in the US and Europe to evaluate the current state of soil nailing practice with respect to soil nail lengths and density, wall heights, wall inclination, and shotcrete thickness, as well as applications. When the cases are considered by project size and soil type, certain inefficiencies appear. Namely, smaller projects exhibit conservatism in nail density and shotcrete thickness, and use only a fully vertical wall. In contrast on larger projects, there appears to be an optimization of these factors. What appears to occurring is that for smaller projects and/or shorter walls, contractors are adopting conservative rules of practice instead of actually designing the projects in accordance with published design manuals. A single, small case is reconsidered using the Geotechnical Engineering Circular No.7, GEC7 design guide resulting in an estimated 7.2% savings.||Type of material:||Conference Publication||Publisher:||Civil Engineering Research Assocation of Ireland||Copyright (published version):||2014 the Authors||Keywords:||Soil nailing; Codes; Design; Optimisation||Other versions:||http://www.cerai.net/||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed||Conference Details:||CERAI 2014, Queens' University Belfast, Northern Ireland, 28 - 29 August 2014|
|Appears in Collections:||Civil Engineering Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.