Toward rigour & parsimony: a primary validation of Kolvereid's (1996) entrepreneurial attitudes scales
Files in This Item:
|McNally_et_al_ER&D_Manuscript_Final.pdf||604.77 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Toward rigour & parsimony: a primary validation of Kolvereid's (1996) entrepreneurial attitudes scales||Authors:||McNally, Jeffrey J.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7704||Date:||18-May-2016||Online since:||2017-10-18T01:00:07Z||Abstract:||Questioning the validity of scholarly work is not a typical path to publication in the management field. However, although considerable scholarship assesses entrepreneurial attitudes and intentions models of behaviour, methodological weaknesses in scale development have hampered scholars' ability to rigorously interpret and build upon their research findings. We review 20 years of research and discover that the pioneer measure of entrepreneurial attitudes as a predictor of self-employment intentions, has yet to be empirically validated. We show that construct and measurement differences, one-off modifications to existing scales and a lack of adequate justification may partially explain why studies in the entrepreneurship education domain have produced inconsistent results. We address this limitation by performing factor analytic techniques on data from two sets of English-speaking university students from two North American countries. The result is a more parsimonious and streamlined 'mini-Kolvereid' scale. We further demonstrate that this scale is an effective predictor of entrepreneurial intentions.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Taylor and Francis||Journal:||Entrepreneurship and Regional Development: An International Journal||Volume:||28||Issue:||5-6||Start page:||358||End page:||379||Copyright (published version):||2016 Informa UK Limited||Keywords:||Entrepreneurship attitudes; Entrepreneurship intentions; Scale validation; Methods; Entrepreneurship; Scale development; Entrepreneurship education||DOI:||10.1080/08985626.2016.1154985||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Business Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.