Contending Expertise: An Interpretive Approach to (Re)conceiving Wind Power's 'Planning Problem'
Files in This Item:
|Lennon_&_Scott_(2015)_Reconceiving_Wind_Powers_Planning_Problem-main_document_minor_revisions_JEPP.pdf||1.17 MB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Contending Expertise: An Interpretive Approach to (Re)conceiving Wind Power's 'Planning Problem'||Authors:||Lennon, Mick
Scott, Mark J.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7837||Date:||2015||Online since:||2016-08-23T15:57:17Z||Abstract:||We explore the complex and multidimensional nature of wind power's 'planning problem' by investigating the ways different knowledges and knowledge holders seek to accumulate authority over the 'facts' of a situation. This is undertaken through an interpretive analysis of how different parties to contentious wind farm debates in Ireland strived to mobilize contending realities wherein they were advantageously positioned as credible sources of knowledge. We advance a novel approach grounded in rhetorical theory that reveals and explains how the different parties to these debates deployed nuanced discursive strategies that constituted their character (ethos) by skilfully interlacing implicit and explicit portrayals of scientific objectivity (logos) with emotive subjectivity (pathos). In doing so, we identify the important role played by 'rescaling' in privileging and marginalizing different perspectives within both the contending discourses and the formal processes of planning application assessment. We draw conclusions from this analysis regarding broader debates in environmental governance and suggest how wind power's 'planning problem' should be reconceived.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Taylor and Francis||Journal:||Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning||Volume:||17||Issue:||5||Start page:||593||End page:||616||Copyright (published version):||2015 Taylor and Francis||Keywords:||Expertise; Discourse; Scale; Wind energy; Planning||DOI:||10.1080/1523908X.2014.1003349||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.