Comparison of diagnostic techniques for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in animal samples
Files in This Item:
|Diagnostic_techniques_for_detection_of_Crypto.pdf||1.13 MB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Comparison of diagnostic techniques for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in animal samples||Authors:||Mirhashemi, Marzieh Ezzaty
Lucy, Frances E.
De Waal, Theo
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8083||Date:||May-2015||Abstract:||While a large number of laboratory methods for the detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in faecal samples are now available, their efficacy for identifying asymptomatic cases of cryptosporidiosis is poorly understood. This study was carried out to determine a reliable screening test for epidemiological studies in livestock. In addition, three molecular tests were compared to identify Cryptosporidium species responsible for the infection in cattle, sheep and horses. A variety of diagnostic tests including microscopic (Kinyoun's staining), immunological (Direct Fluorescence Antibody tests or DFAT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and molecular methods (nested PCR) were compared to assess their ability to detect Cryptosporidium in cattle, horse and sheep faecal samples. The results indicate that the sensitivity and specificity of each test is highly dependent on the input samples; while Kinyoun's and DFAT proved to be reliable screening tools for cattle samples, DFAT and PCR analysis (targeted at the 18S rRNA gene fragment) were more sensitive for screening sheep and horse samples. Finally different PCR primer sets targetedat the same region resulted in the preferential amplification of certain Cryptosporidium species when multiple species were present in the sample. Therefore, for identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in the event of asymptomatic cryptosporidiosis, the combination of different 18S rRNA nested PCR primer sets is recommended for further epidemiological applications and also tracking the sources of infection.||Funding Details:||Environmental Protection Agency||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Elsevier||Copyright (published version):||2015 Elsevier||Keywords:||Cryptosporidium;Cattle;Horse;Sheep;Diagnostic techniques;Molecular methods;Latent class analysis||DOI:||10.1016/j.exppara.2015.01.018||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science Research Collection|
Veterinary Medicine Research Collection
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.