Technologically captured? How material agency sustains interaction between regulators and industrial actors

Files in This Item:
Access to this item has been restricted by the copyright holder until:2019-08-29
File Description SizeFormat 
ResPol_Finch_et_al_final_accepted_version.pdf510.14 kBAdobe PDFDownload    Request a copy
Title: Technologically captured? How material agency sustains interaction between regulators and industrial actors
Authors: Finch, John
Geiger, Susi
Reid, Emma
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8184
Date: 2016
Abstract: This paper examines how environmental regulation is made operational when it legislates for modifications rather than the banning of products or substances. The continued circulation of such products draws attention to the heterogeneous conditions of their use and allows industry actors to accumulate evidence of the products' polluting effects over time. We find that this agentic quality of materials – including products and sites of application – is a vital and so far largely ignored dimension in the relationship between environmental regulation and innovation. This is captured in a process we term interactive stabilization, which describes how material agency becomes a focus for interactions between regulatory and industry actors. We develop our argument through an in-depth case study of the environmental regulation of production chemistry and identify three interactive processes: formulating regulatory principles; operationalizing these principles through technical documentation and calculation; and incremental innovation as used by chemists to address clients’ varied material problems in production. We trace stabilizing and destabilizing effects across these three processes and draw particular attention to the role of uncertainty in the operationalization of precaution as a regulatory principle. We argue that this uncertainty may lead to a form of regulatory capture that we frame as technological capture. This refers to how industry actors are able to test the limits of regulatory principles and calculations and on occasion contest these through their applied science capabilities.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Elsevier
Copyright (published version): 2016 Elsevier
Keywords: Regulation;Technology marketing;Regulatory capture;Sales
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.08.002
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Business Research Collection
UCD RePEc Archive Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jun 23, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.