Evaluations of post-disaster recovery: A review of practice material

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EvidenceBase2016Issue4Version1.pdf432.64 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Evaluations of post-disaster recovery: A review of practice material
Authors: Ryan, Roberta
Wortley, Liana
Ní Shé, Éidín
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8195
Date: Dec-2016
Online since: 2016-12-08T16:42:09Z
Abstract: This paper reviews evaluations of post-disaster recovery efforts. The focus is on operational material and other ‘grey literature’ from disasters that have occurred in Australia, New Zealand and internationally. We develop a typology that categorises disaster events and includes whether evaluations were undertaken; the methods used; and whether the evaluations focused on the processes or outcomes of the recovery program. The review finds a lack of evaluation of post-disaster recovery. Where evaluations have been conducted, they are mostly process- rather than outcomes-based. There is a need for guidance for post-disaster recovery programs to support evaluation practice to determine the effectiveness, efficiency and appropriateness of post-disaster recovery interventions. There is significant investment in post-disaster recovery programs, with little known of their effectiveness. This review identifies useful case studies and methods to evaluate post-disaster recovery efforts, and informs the development of a national post-disaster evaluation framework.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Australia and New Zealand School of Government
Journal: ANZSOG Evidence Base
Volume: 1
Issue: 4
Start page: 1
End page: 33
Copyright (published version): 2016 The Australia and New Zealand School of Government
Keywords: DisasterPost-disasterEvaluation
Other versions: https://journal.anzsog.edu.au/publications/41/EvidenceBase2016Issue4Version1.pdf
Language: en
Status of Item: Not peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems Research Collection

Show full item record

Download(s) 50

checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.