Environmental and wider economic implications of modifications to environmental tax reform

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dunnel_workpap_003.pdf85.08 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Environmental and wider economic implications of modifications to environmental tax reform
Authors: Clinch, J. PeterDunne, Louise
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/822
Date: Mar-2002
Online since: 2009-01-30T16:36:34Z
Abstract: The most common definition of Environmental Tax Reform (ETR) is the use of the revenue from environmental taxes to reduce distortionary labour taxes. However, the PETRAS project has shown that there are a number of social and political impediments to implementing such reform. This paper firstly outlines some of the environmental and economic implications of environmental taxes generally. It goes on to explore three broad approaches to ETR, based on the allocation of the tax revenues, and explores the environmental and economic implications of each approach and the likelihood of political and social acceptance. Particular attention is paid to ameliorating regressive impacts and impacts on competitiveness. It is concluded that some combination of hypothecating a proportion ofrevenues to environmental projects and diverting rest to reduce labour taxes is probably the best approach in light of the results of the project. The balance should depend upon local labour market and macroeconomic conditions, the extent to which environmental projects are already funded and the extent of government failure. Funding should only provided to environmental projects if it can be shown that, in themselves, they are economically efficient. In addition, it is most important that a proportion of the funds be used to ameliorate any regressive impacts. It is also important to bear in mind that hypothecation or recycling of revenue is not the same as a tax shift, which is a reform of the entire system, so some of these approaches may take away from the integrity of ETR. The paper concludes with some of the initiatives that are likely to be necessary to facilitate social and political acceptance of this approach to ETR.
Type of material: Working Paper
Publisher: University College Dublin. School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy
Series/Report no.: Environmental Studies Research Series; ESRS/02/01
Copyright (published version): Copyright J.P. Clinch and L.A. Dunne (2002)
Subject LCSH: Environmental impact charges--Europe
Environmental impact charges--Economic aspects
Environmental impact charges--Political aspects
Other versions: http://www.ucd.ie/gpep/gpepinfo/workingpapers/02-01.pdf
Language: en
Status of Item: Not peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy Working Papers & Policy Briefs

Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Apr 2, 2020


checked on Apr 2, 2020

Google ScholarTM


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.