Video games as virtual teachers: Prosocial video game use by children and adolescents from different socioeconomic groups is associated with increased empathy and prosocial behaviour
Files in This Item:
|HarringtonOConnell_2016_UCDResearchRep.pdf||431.92 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Video games as virtual teachers: Prosocial video game use by children and adolescents from different socioeconomic groups is associated with increased empathy and prosocial behaviour||Authors:||Harrington, Brian
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8329||Date:||Oct-2016||Abstract:||Objective: The main aim of this study was to determine if there was a positive relationship between prosocial video game use and prosocial behaviour in children and adolescents. Method: This study had a cross-sectional correlational design. Data were collected from 538 9–15 year old children and adolescents between March and December 2014. Participants completed measures of empathy, prosocial behaviour and video game habits. Teachers rated the prosocial behaviour of participants. The socioeconomic status of participants was also gathered. Results: Multiple linear regressions were conducted on these data. Prosocial video game use was positively associated with the tendency to maintain positive affective relationships, cooperation and sharing as well as empathy. This association remained significant after controlling for gender, age, school type (disadvantaged/non-disadvantaged), socioeconomic status, weekly game play and violent video game use. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that prosocial video game use could develop empathic concern and improve affective relationships in a diverse population of young people.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Elsevier||Journal:||Computers in Human Behavior||Volume:||63||Start page:||650||End page:||658||Copyright (published version):||2016 Elsevier||Keywords:||Prosocial video game use; Violent video game use; Prosocial behaviour; Empathy; Socioeconomic status; Young people||DOI:||10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.062||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Psychology Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.