Defining 'Official' Built Heritage Discourses within the Irish Planning Framework: Insights from Conservation Planning as Social Practice
Files in This Item:
|Parkinson_Scott_Redmond_-_Defining_official_built_heritage_discourses.pdf||383.83 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Defining 'Official' Built Heritage Discourses within the Irish Planning Framework: Insights from Conservation Planning as Social Practice||Authors:||Parkinson, Arthur; Scott, Mark J.; Redmond, Declan||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8678||Date:||2015||Online since:||2017-07-26T11:47:31Z||Abstract:||Conservation of built heritage is a key planning process and goal which shapes urban development outcomes across European cities. In Ireland, conservation of the built heritage is a key part of the planning framework, albeit one that is, in comparative terms, only recently established. While it is widely recognized that the underlying rationale for conservation of built heritage varies considerably (from cultural priorities to place marketing), the literature suggests that heritage and conservation professionals perform a key role in controlling decision-making through an official or 'authorized' heritage discourse (AHD), emphasizing expert values and knowledge and based around selective heritage storylines often reflecting elite tastes. Drawing on policy and practice in Ireland, in this paper, we contribute to these debates by further unpacking the AHD, exploring tensions within the heritage policy elite through examination of competing views and representations relating to the purpose of built heritage protection. Based on a discourse analysis following interviews with key national actors, we identify two key narratives—a ''museum-curatorial' discourse and an 'inclusive heritage' discourse—which in turn frame conservation practices. We argue that subtle variations of heritage meanings have the potential to either reproduce (museum-curatorial discourse) or challenge (inclusive heritage discourse) conventional modes of practice, particularly relating to the relationship between built heritage and identity and the role of public engagement.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Taylor and Francis||Journal:||European Planning Studies||Volume:||24||Issue:||2||Start page:||277||End page:||296||Copyright (published version):||2015 Taylor and Francis||Keywords:||Built heritage; Conservation; Discourse; Conservation planning; Ireland||DOI:||10.1080/09654313.2015.1077782||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.