Defining 'Official' Built Heritage Discourses within the Irish Planning Framework: Insights from Conservation Planning as Social Practice

Files in This Item:
 File SizeFormat
DownloadParkinson_Scott_Redmond_-_Defining_official_built_heritage_discourses.pdf383.83 kBAdobe PDF
Title: Defining 'Official' Built Heritage Discourses within the Irish Planning Framework: Insights from Conservation Planning as Social Practice
Authors: Parkinson, ArthurScott, Mark J.Redmond, Declan
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8678
Date: 2015
Online since: 2017-07-26T11:47:31Z
Abstract: Conservation of built heritage is a key planning process and goal which shapes urban development outcomes across European cities. In Ireland, conservation of the built heritage is a key part of the planning framework, albeit one that is, in comparative terms, only recently established. While it is widely recognized that the underlying rationale for conservation of built heritage varies considerably (from cultural priorities to place marketing), the literature suggests that heritage and conservation professionals perform a key role in controlling decision-making through an official or 'authorized' heritage discourse (AHD), emphasizing expert values and knowledge and based around selective heritage storylines often reflecting elite tastes. Drawing on policy and practice in Ireland, in this paper, we contribute to these debates by further unpacking the AHD, exploring tensions within the heritage policy elite through examination of competing views and representations relating to the purpose of built heritage protection. Based on a discourse analysis following interviews with key national actors, we identify two key narratives—a ''museum-curatorial' discourse and an 'inclusive heritage' discourse—which in turn frame conservation practices. We argue that subtle variations of heritage meanings have the potential to either reproduce (museum-curatorial discourse) or challenge (inclusive heritage discourse) conventional modes of practice, particularly relating to the relationship between built heritage and identity and the role of public engagement.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Journal: European Planning Studies
Volume: 24
Issue: 2
Start page: 277
End page: 296
Copyright (published version): 2015 Taylor and Francis
Keywords: Built heritageConservationDiscourseConservation planningIreland
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1077782
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
Appears in Collections:Architecture, Planning and Environmental Policy Research Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

9
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Sep 11, 2020

Page view(s)

1,220
Last Week
9
Last month
15
checked on May 26, 2022

Download(s) 20

765
checked on May 26, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.