The performance of the interferon gamma assay when used as a diagnostic or quality assurance test in Mycobacterium bovis infected herds
|Title:||The performance of the interferon gamma assay when used as a diagnostic or quality assurance test in Mycobacterium bovis infected herds||Authors:||Clegg, Tracy A.
Doyle, Mairead B.
More, Simon John
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8699||Date:||1-May-2017||Abstract:||There are two different contexts in the Irish bTB eradication programme in which the interferon-gamma assay (IFN-γ) is applied. Firstly, the IFN-γ assay is applied routinely to high risk cohorts in herds with four or more reactors to the SICTT. The IFN-γ test is then carried out on blood samples submitted to the laboratory within 8 h of collection (diagnostic testing). Secondly, the use of the IFN-γ assay has recently been extended to test SICTT reactors as part of a general quality assurance (QA) scheme to monitor the performance of the SICTT. Blood samples from reactors are tested one day after blood collection (QA testing). In this study, we analysed the relative performance of the SICTT and IFN-γ when used in parallel as an 8 h diagnostic test and as a 24 h QA test on SICTT reactors. A total of 17,725 IFN-γ tests were included in the analysis (11,658 diagnostic tests and 6067 QA tests). Of the samples submitted for diagnostic testing, the proportion positive to IFN-γ decreased with the severity of interpretation of the SICTT result. Of the standard reactors that were tested with IFN-γ in the QA programme, 92.2% were positive to the IFN-γ test. Among animals that were SICTT −ve/IFN-γ +ve, 18.9% were positive at post-mortem compared to 11.8% of those that were SICTT +ve (standard reactor)/IFN-γ −ve. These results highlight the risk associated with retaining SICTT −ve/IFN-γ +ve animals, and suggest that prompt removal of these animals is necessary to reduce the potential for future transmission.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Elsevier||Copyright (published version):||2017 the Authors||Keywords:||Bovine tuberculosis;Mycobacterium bovis;Diagnostic;Interferon-gamma assay;Single intradermal comparative tuberculin test (SICTT);Post-mortem||DOI:||10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.007||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Veterinary Medicine Research Collection|
CVERA Research Collection
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.