Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier - A conjoint analysis study

Files in This Item:
Access to this item has been restricted by the copyright holder until:2018-09-01
File Description SizeFormat 
Consumer_evaluations_of_processed_meat_products_reformulated_to_be_healthier_¿_a_conjoint_analysis_study.docx71.24 kBMicrosoft WordDownload    Request a copy
Title: Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier - A conjoint analysis study
Authors: Shan, Liran Christine
De Brún, Aoife
Henchion, Maeve
Li, Chenguang
Murrin, Celine
Wall, Patrick G.
Monahan, Frank J.
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/8707
Date: Sep-2017
Abstract: Recent innovations in processed meats focus on healthier reformulations through reducing negative constituents and/or adding health beneficial ingredients. This study explored the influence of base meat product (ham, sausages, beef burger), salt and/or fat content (reduced or not), healthy ingredients (omega 3, vitamin E, none), and price (average or higher than average) on consumers' purchase intention and quality judgement of processed meats. A survey (n = 481) using conjoint methodology and cluster analysis was conducted. Price and base meat product were most important for consumers' purchase intention, followed by healthy ingredient and salt and/or fat content. In reformulation, consumers had a preference for ham and sausages over beef burgers, and for reduced salt and/or fat over non reduction. In relation to healthy ingredients, omega 3 was preferred over none, and vitamin E was least preferred. Healthier reformulations improved the perceived healthiness of processed meats. Cluster analyses identified three consumer segments with different product preferences.
Funding Details: Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Elsevier
Copyright (published version): 2017 Elsevier
Keywords: Processed meat;Health;Consumer;Conjoint analysis;Consumer segmentation
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.04.239
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems Research Collection
Institute of Food and Health Research Collection
Agriculture and Food Science Research Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

8
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jun 22, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.