Bad Neighbors? How co-located Chinese and World Bank Development Projects Impact Local Corruption in Tanzania
Files in This Item:
|Bad_Neighbors_Research_Repository.docx||2.61 MB||Microsoft Word||Download|
|Title:||Bad Neighbors? How co-located Chinese and World Bank Development Projects Impact Local Corruption in Tanzania||Authors:||Brazys, Samuel
Elkink, Johan A.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9063||Date:||Jun-2017||Abstract:||The rise of China as a "non-traditional" development partner has been one of the most important phenomena in the field over the past decade. The lack of transparency in Chinese development projects, coupled with an uninterested stance towards governance, lead many to wonder if Chinese engagement will contribute to or undermine existing development efforts. This paper adds to the debate by inquiring as to the relationship of Chinese development efforts with perceptions of, and experiences with, corruption when projects are closely-located to those from a traditional donor, the World Bank. Taking advantage of spatial data, the paper evidences an association between the location of a larger number of Chinese projects and higher experiences with and, to some extent, perceptions of corruption when accounting for co-located World Bank projects. Likewise, while World Bank projects are associated with lower levels of corruption in the absence of Chinese projects, this relationship disappears when Chinese projects are nearby. However, these relationships only hold for Chinese projects which are not "aid-like," suggesting that the differentiation of Chinese overseas flows is an important consideration when studying China as a development partner.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Springer||Copyright (published version):||2017 Springer||Keywords:||China;World Bank;ODA;OOF;Development;Corruption;Governance;AidData;Tanzania;Africa||DOI:||10.1007/s11558-017-9273-4||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Politics and International Relations Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.