Bad Neighbors? How co-located Chinese and World Bank Development Projects Impact Local Corruption in Tanzania

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Bad_Neighbors_Research_Repository.docx2.61 MBMicrosoft WordDownload
Title: Bad Neighbors? How co-located Chinese and World Bank Development Projects Impact Local Corruption in Tanzania
Authors: Brazys, Samuel
Elkink, Johan A.
Kelly, Gina
Permanent link:
Date: Jun-2017
Online since: 2018-03-23T02:00:11Z
Abstract: The rise of China as a "non-traditional" development partner has been one of the most important phenomena in the field over the past decade. The lack of transparency in Chinese development projects, coupled with an uninterested stance towards governance, lead many to wonder if Chinese engagement will contribute to or undermine existing development efforts. This paper adds to the debate by inquiring as to the relationship of Chinese development efforts with perceptions of, and experiences with, corruption when projects are closely-located to those from a traditional donor, the World Bank. Taking advantage of spatial data, the paper evidences an association between the location of a larger number of Chinese projects and higher experiences with and, to some extent, perceptions of corruption when accounting for co-located World Bank projects. Likewise, while World Bank projects are associated with lower levels of corruption in the absence of Chinese projects, this relationship disappears when Chinese projects are nearby. However, these relationships only hold for Chinese projects which are not "aid-like," suggesting that the differentiation of Chinese overseas flows is an important consideration when studying China as a development partner.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Springer
Journal: Review of International Organizations
Volume: 12
Issue: 2
Start page: 227
End page: 253
Copyright (published version): 2017 Springer
Keywords: ChinaWorld BankODAOOFDevelopmentCorruptionGovernanceAidDataTanzaniaAfrica
DOI: 10.1007/s11558-017-9273-4
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Politics and International Relations Research Collection

Show full item record

Citations 50

Last Week
Last month
checked on Feb 18, 2019

Google ScholarTM



This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.