How do ideas shape national preferences? The Financial Transaction Tax in Ireland

Files in This Item:
 File SizeFormat
DownloadHardiman_and_Metinsoy,_How_do_ideas_shape_national_preferences._Oct_2017.pdf880.49 kBAdobe PDF
Title: How do ideas shape national preferences? The Financial Transaction Tax in Ireland
Authors: Hardiman, NiamhMetinsoy, Saliha
Permanent link:
Date: Oct-2017
Online since: 2018-01-24T16:02:52Z
Abstract: European countries have been required to formulate a national preference in relation to the EU Financial Transaction Tax. The two leading approaches to explaining how the financial sector makes its views felt in the political process – the structural power of the financial services sector based on potential disinvestment, and its instrumental power arising from direct political lobbying – fall short of providing a comprehensive account. The missing link is how and why policy-makers might be willing to adopt the priorities of key sectors of the financial services industry. We outline how two levels of ideational power might be at work in shaping outcomes, using Ireland as a case study. We argue firstly that background systems of shared knowledge that are institutionalized in policy networks generated broad ideational convergence between the financial sector and policymakers over the priorities of industrial policy in general. Secondly, and against that backdrop, debate over specific policy choices can leave room for a wider range of disagreement and indeed political and ideational contestation. Irish policymakers proved responsive to industry interests in the case of the FTT, but not for the reasons normally given. This work seeks to link literatures in two fields of inquiry. It poses questions for liberal intergovernmentalism in suggesting that the translation of structurally grounded material interests into national policy preferences is far from automatic, and argues that this is mediated by ideational considerations that are often under-estimated. It also contributes to our understanding of how constructivist explanations of policy outcomes work in practice, through a detailed case study of how material and ideational interests interact.
Funding Details: European Commission Horizon 2020
Type of material: Working Paper
Publisher: EMU Choices
Start page: 1
End page: 41
Keywords: Economic integrationMultinational firmsInternational businessGlobalizationBusiness taxes and subsidiesIntergovernmental relations
JEL Codes: F02; F15; F23; F55; F68; H25; H70; P16
Other versions:
Language: en
Status of Item: Not peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License:
Appears in Collections:Politics and International Relations Research Collection
Geary Institute Research Collection
UCD RePEc Archive Collection

Show full item record

Page view(s) 50

Last Week
Last month
checked on Jun 29, 2022

Download(s) 50

checked on Jun 29, 2022

Google ScholarTM



If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.