3D enamel thickness in Neandertal and modern human permanent canines
Files in This Item:
|9-buti_et_al._2017._3D_ethick_Neand_HS_canines._JHE_113_162-172.pdf||1.61 MB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||3D enamel thickness in Neandertal and modern human permanent canines||Authors:||Buti, Laura
Le Cabec, Adeline
Feeney, Robin N. M.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9215||Date:||Dec-2017||Abstract:||Enamel thickness figures prominently in studies of human evolution, particularly for taxonomy, phylogeny, and paleodietary reconstruction. Attention has focused on molar teeth, through the use of advanced imaging technologies and novel protocols. Despite the important results achieved thus far, further work is needed to investigate all tooth classes. We apply a recent approach developed for anterior teeth to investigate the 3D enamel thickness of Neandertal and modern human (MH) canines. In terms of crown size, the values obtained for both upper and lower unworn/slightly worn canines are significantly greater in Neandertals than in Upper Paleolithic and recent MH. The 3D relative enamel thickness (RET) is significantly lower in Neandertals than in MH. Moreover, differences in 3D RET values between the two groups appear to decrease in worn canines beginning from wear stage 3, suggesting that both the pattern and the stage of wear may have important effects on the 3D RET value. Nevertheless, the 3D average enamel thickness (AET) does not differ between the two groups. In both groups, 3D AET and 3D RET indices are greater in upper canines than in lower canines, and overall the enamel is thicker on the occlusal half of the labial aspect of the crown, particularly in MH. By contrast, the few early modern humans investigated show the highest volumes of enamel while for all other components of 3D enamel, thickness this group holds an intermediate position between Neandertals and recent MH. Overall, our study supports the general findings that Neandertals have relatively thinner enamel than MH (as also observed in molars), indicating that unworn/slightly worn canines can be successfully used to discriminate between the two groups. Further studies, however, are needed to understand whether these differences are functionally related or are the result of pleiotropic or genetic drift effects. Overall, our study supports the general findings that Neandertals have relatively thinner enamel than MH (as also observed in molars), indicating that unworn/slightly worn canines can be successfully used to discriminate between the two groups. Further studies, however, are needed to understand whether these differences are functionally related or are the result of pleiotropic or genetic drift effects.||Funding Details:||European Commission Horizon 2020
European Research Council
|Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Elsevier||Journal:||Journal of Human Evolution||Volume:||113||Start page:||162||End page:||172||Copyright (published version):||2017 the Authors||Keywords:||Dental tissue proportions; Micro-CT; 3D dental morphology; Average enamel thickness; Relative enamel thickness; Enamel 3D distribution||DOI:||10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.08.009||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Medicine Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.