What Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimation

Files in This Item:
Access to this item has been restricted by the copyright holder until:2018-09-16
File Description SizeFormat 
Dukalskis_&_Gerschewski_2017.docx124.08 kBMicrosoft WordDownload
Title: What Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimation
Authors: Dukalskis, Alexander
Gerschewski, Johannes
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9220
Date: Mar-2017
Abstract: Autocratic governments make claims about why they are entitled to rule. Some autocracies are more talkative than others, but all regimes say something about why they deserve power. This article takes seriously these efforts by introducing and interrogating the concept of autocratic legitimation. After engaging in a definitional discussion, it traces the development of autocratic legitimation in modern political science by identifying major turning points, key concepts, and patterns of inquiry over time. Ultimately, this introductory article aims to not only argue that studying autocratic legitimation is important, but also to propose context, concepts, and distinctions for doing so productively. To this end, the article proposes four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation that can facilitate comparative analysis: indoctrination, passivity, performance, and democratic-procedural. Finally, the essay briefly introduces the five original articles that comprise the remainder of this special issue on autocratic legitimation. The article identifies avenues for further research and identifies how each article in the issue advances down productive pathways of inquiry.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Journal: Contemporary Politics
Volume: 23
Issue: 3
Start page: 251
End page: 268
Copyright (published version): 2017 Taylor and Francis
Keywords: AutocracyAuthoritarianismLegitimationLegitimacyTotalitarianismElections
DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2017.1304320
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Politics and International Relations Research Collection

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

6
Last Week
1
Last month
checked on Oct 11, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.