What Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimation

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDukalskis, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorGerschewski, Johannes-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-12T14:03:05Z-
dc.date.copyright2017 Taylor and Francisen
dc.date.issued2017-03-
dc.identifier.citationContemporary Politicsen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/9220-
dc.description.abstractAutocratic governments make claims about why they are entitled to rule. Some autocracies are more talkative than others, but all regimes say something about why they deserve power. This article takes seriously these efforts by introducing and interrogating the concept of autocratic legitimation. After engaging in a definitional discussion, it traces the development of autocratic legitimation in modern political science by identifying major turning points, key concepts, and patterns of inquiry over time. Ultimately, this introductory article aims to not only argue that studying autocratic legitimation is important, but also to propose context, concepts, and distinctions for doing so productively. To this end, the article proposes four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation that can facilitate comparative analysis: indoctrination, passivity, performance, and democratic-procedural. Finally, the essay briefly introduces the five original articles that comprise the remainder of this special issue on autocratic legitimation. The article identifies avenues for further research and identifies how each article in the issue advances down productive pathways of inquiry.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.rightsThis is an electronic version of an article published in Contemporary Politics 23 (3), pp.251-268. Contemporary Politics is available online at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13569775.2017.1304320en
dc.subjectAutocracyen
dc.subjectAuthoritarianismen
dc.subjectLegitimationen
dc.subjectLegitimacyen
dc.subjectTotalitarianismen
dc.subjectElectionsen
dc.titleWhat Autocracies Say (and What Citizens Hear): Proposing Four Mechanisms of Autocratic Legitimationen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.internal.authorcontactotheralexander.dukalskis@ucd.ie-
dc.statusPeer revieweden
dc.identifier.volume23en
dc.identifier.issue3en
dc.identifier.startpage251en
dc.identifier.endpage268en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13569775.2017.1304320-
dc.neeo.contributorDukalskis|Alexander|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorGerschewski|Johannes|aut|-
dc.date.embargo2018-09-16-
dc.internal.rmsid733312059-
dc.date.updated2017-11-15T08:12:37Z-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/en
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Politics and International Relations Research Collection
Files in This Item:
 File SizeFormat
DownloadDukalskis_&_Gerschewski_2017.docx124.08 kBMicrosoft Word
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

26
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Sep 12, 2020

Page view(s)

1,061
Last Week
2
Last month
14
checked on Aug 19, 2022

Download(s) 50

377
checked on Aug 19, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.