Idleness, Usefulness and Self-Constitution

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Brian_O'Connor_-_Idleness,_Usefulness_and_Self-Constitution.pdf313.28 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Idleness, Usefulness and Self-Constitution
Authors: O'Connor, Brian
Permanent link:
Date: 2013
Abstract: The core argument of the paper is that the modern philosophical notion of self-constitution is directed against the prospect of human beings dissolving into idleness. Arguments for self-constitution are marked by non-philosophical presuppositions about the value of usefulness. Those arguments also assume a particular conception of superior experience as conscious integration of a person's actions within an identifiable set of chosen commitments. Exploring particular arguments by Hegel, Kant, Korsgaard and Frankfurt the paper claims that those arguments are problematic in the various ways in which they suppose usefulness and explicitly or implicitly take extra-philosophical views of idleness.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Copyright (published version): 2015 Taylor & Francis
Keywords: CareHegelIdlenessKantKorsgaardLeisureMoral agencyProductivityF. SchlegelUsefulness
DOI: 10.1179/1440991713Z.0000000005
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Philosophy Research Collection

Show full item record

Citations 50

Last Week
Last month
checked on Aug 18, 2018

Google ScholarTM



This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.