Idleness, Usefulness and Self-Constitution
Files in This Item:
|Brian_O'Connor_-_Idleness,_Usefulness_and_Self-Constitution.pdf||313.28 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Idleness, Usefulness and Self-Constitution||Authors:||O'Connor, Brian||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9289||Date:||2013||Abstract:||The core argument of the paper is that the modern philosophical notion of self-constitution is directed against the prospect of human beings dissolving into idleness. Arguments for self-constitution are marked by non-philosophical presuppositions about the value of usefulness. Those arguments also assume a particular conception of superior experience as conscious integration of a person's actions within an identifiable set of chosen commitments. Exploring particular arguments by Hegel, Kant, Korsgaard and Frankfurt the paper claims that those arguments are problematic in the various ways in which they suppose usefulness and explicitly or implicitly take extra-philosophical views of idleness.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Taylor & Francis||Copyright (published version):||2015 Taylor & Francis||Keywords:||Care; Hegel; Idleness; Kant; Korsgaard; Leisure; Moral agency; Productivity; F. Schlegel; Usefulness||DOI:||10.1179/1440991713Z.0000000005||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.