Market failures and market framings: Can a market be transformed from the inside?

Files in This Item:
Access to this item has been restricted by the copyright holder until:2018-08-19
File Description SizeFormat 
Geiger_and_Gross_Org_Studies_final_submitted_version.pdf735.49 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Market failures and market framings: Can a market be transformed from the inside?
Authors: Geiger, Susi
Gross, Nicole
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9377
Date: 19-Aug-2017
Abstract: How do actors innovate markets in cases of perceived market failures? This paper’s aim is to examine what happens when a market is innovated or, as we call it, ‘redevised’ in situations where public and commercial interests significantly diverge. Market devices can serve an important function in such attempts to innovate markets: they are material and/or social arrangements that are put into place to shape the market in question in certain ways. But can such devices really transform a market from within? To examine this question we trace the history of the Geneva Medicines Patent Pool, a civil society initiative introduced to change pharmaceutical firms’ licensing and collaboration practices in the market for HIV/AIDS medicines. Our empirical results indicate that redevising a market in response to market failures can shift the market’s frames and contribute to altering its practices, but that this is a pragmatic and often lengthy process that is never fully predictable in advance. By attending to the intended and unintended consequences - or misfires - of redevising a market, our study raises important questions around acting in and on the market, market innovation’s’ ontological impact, zooming in and zooming out when studying redevising, and attending to the temporality of market innovation.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Sage
Copyright (published version): 2017 Sage
Keywords: Market failureMarket devicePatentsPharmaceutical industryMarket innovationPatent pool
DOI: 10.1177/0170840617717098
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Business Research Collection

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.