Terms of service and bills of rights: new mechanisms of constitutionalisation in the social media environment?
Files in This Item:
|E. Celeste - Terms of Service and Bills of Rights - AM.pdf||256.01 kB||Adobe PDF||Download Request a copy|
|Title:||Terms of service and bills of rights: new mechanisms of constitutionalisation in the social media environment?||Authors:||Celeste, Edoardo||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9423||Date:||21-May-2018||Abstract:||From a cursory look at the terms of service of the main social networking websites, it is immediately possible to detect that Facebook’s show a peculiar configuration. Although they represent a mere contract between private parties, these terms adopt the traditional jargon of constitutional texts and articulate their contents in terms of rights, principles and duties. This curious pairing between norms regulating social media and the constitutional sphere is also apparent in a series of non-binding documents that are unequivocally named ‘bill of rights’ and seek to articulate a set of principles to protect social media users. This paper examines whether the emergence of a constitutional tone in this limited number of texts could be related to the effective, or aspirational, constitutional function that these documents exercise. The identification of a series of significant shortcomings will lead to exclude that social media’s terms of service and bills of rights of social media users currently play a constitutionalising role. Nevertheless, the possibility to theoretically justify the use of these documents as mechanisms of constitutionalisation in the social media environment will be adduced as an evidence of the potential constitutional aspirations of these texts.||Funding Details:||Irish Research Council||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Taylor & Francis||Journal:||International Review of Law, Computers & Technology||Copyright (published version):||2018 Taylor & Francis||Keywords:||Social media; Terms of service; Internet bills of rights; Digital constitutionalism||DOI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9423
|Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Law Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.