The Troika’s variations on a trio: Why the loan programmes worked so differently in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal
|Title:||The Troika’s variations on a trio: Why the loan programmes worked so differently in Greece, Ireland, and Portugal||Authors:||Hardiman, Niamh
Araújo, Joaquim Filipe
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9573||Date:||17-Oct-2017||Online since:||2018-11-30T10:26:13Z||Abstract:||Portugal and Ireland exited Troika loan programmes; Greece did not. The conventional narrative is that different outcomes are best explained by differences in national competences in implementing programme requirements. This paper argues that three factors distinguish the Greek experience from that of Ireland and Portugal: different economic, political, and institutional starting conditions; the ad hoc nature of the European institutions’ approach to crisis resolution; and the very different conditionalities built into each of the loan programmes as a result. Ireland and Portugal show some signs of recovery despite austerity measures, but Greece has been burdened beyond all capacity to recover convincingly.||Type of material:||Working Paper||Publisher:||University College Dublin. Geary Institute||Series/Report no.:||UCD Geary Institute Discussion Paper Series; WP2017/11||Keywords:||Loan programme; Eurozone crisis; Conditionality; Troika; European periphery||Other versions:||https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucd/wpaper/201711.html||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Not peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Geary Institute Working Papers|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.