Feminist Philosophy, Pragmatism, and the “Turn to Affect”: A Genealogical Critique
Files in This Item:
|Feminist Philosophy, Pragmatism, and the Turn to Affect - 02.06.2016.pdf||228.21 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Feminist Philosophy, Pragmatism, and the “Turn to Affect”: A Genealogical Critique||Authors:||Fischer, Clara||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/9622||Date:||14-Oct-2016||Online since:||2019-02-28T10:07:20Z||Abstract:||Recent years have witnessed a focus on feeling as a topic of reinvigorated scholarly concern, described by theorists in a range of disciplines in terms of a 'turn to affect.' Surprisingly little has been said about this most recent shift in critical theorizing by philosophers, including feminist philosophers, despite the fact that affect theorists situate their work within feminist and related, sometimes intersectional, political projects. In this article, I redress the seeming elision of the 'turn to affect' in feminist philosophy, and develop a critique of some of the claims made by affect theorists that builds upon concerns regarding the 'newness' of affect and emotion in feminist theory, and the risks of erasure this may entail. To support these concerns, I present a brief genealogy of feminist philosophical work on affect and emotion. Identifying a reductive tendency within affect theory to equate affect with bodily immanence, and to preclude cognition, culture, and representation, I argue that contemporary feminist theorists would do well to follow the more holistic models espoused by the canon of feminist work on emotion. Furthermore, I propose that prominent affect theorist Brian Massumi is right to return to pragmatism as a means of redressing philosophical dualisms, such as emotion/cognition and mind/body, but suggest that such a project is better served by John Dewey's philosophy of emotion than by William James's.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Wiley||Journal:||Hypatia||Volume:||31||Issue:||4||Start page:||810||End page:||826||Copyright (published version):||2016 Hypatia||Keywords:||Critical theory; Feminist philosophy; Pragmatism||DOI:||10.1111/hypa.12296||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.